From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18069 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2014 13:25:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18054 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jun 2014 13:25:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:25:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380831161A8; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:25:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id uPBzc0y2fwrn; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:25:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066C21161A2; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:25:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C9E5540EBB; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 06:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:25:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] more constification Message-ID: <20140623132512.GD5281@adacore.com> References: <1402512797-6082-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <20140612084534.GC4730@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00811.txt.bz2 > PDR (Procedure Descriptor Record) data is produced for all the usual MIPS > Linux and bare-iron ELF targets (and probably IRIX too as it is where this > stuff originates from) and both GAS and GCC continue supporting it even > though plain ECOFF support has been removed. I know of no plans to > deprecate it. In fact I have a patch outstanding to restitute some of > this stuff that got deleted a while ago from GDB (apparently, by accident, > it was not enabled for any target) and extend it somewhat, although this > being rather dated still requires some polishing. Thanks, Maciej. Do you think it'd be possible to move that code elsewhere? I'd go with mips-unwind or mips-tdep. I like modularization, so I vote for mips-unwind. -- Joel