From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22934 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2014 15:13:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22921 invoked by uid 89); 24 Oct 2014 15:13:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.111) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:13:02 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:12:58 +0100 Received: from d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.15) by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.145) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:12:55 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D061B08049 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:12:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.228]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s9OFCt8a51773554 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:12:55 GMT Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s9OFCsu1012045 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:12:55 -0600 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with SMTP id s9OFCqc7012001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:12:52 -0600 Message-Id: <201410241512.s9OFCqc7012001@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:12:52 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Python API: Add gdb.is_in_prologue and gdb.is_in_epilogue. To: palves@redhat.com (Pedro Alves) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:13:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: martin.galvan@tallertechnologies.com (Martin Galvan), gdb-patches@sourceware.org, dje@google.com, eliz@gnu.org (Eli Zaretskii) In-Reply-To: <544A68B1.9000909@redhat.com> from "Pedro Alves" at Oct 24, 2014 03:56:49 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14102415-0021-0000-0000-00000187A0A0 X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00647.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] Revert nexti prologue check > > From Fernando Nasser: > * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Handle "nexti" inside function > prologues. This makes sense to me. Minor nit: please also remove the comment > /* Also, maybe we just did a "nexti" inside a prolog, so we > thought it was a subroutine call but it was not. Stop as > well. FENN */ Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com