public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: sivachandra@google.com (Siva Chandra)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org (gdb-patches)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR c++/17494 - Fix evaluation of method calls under EVAL_SKIP
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201411031508.sA3F815b024788@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGyQ6gxnfw6yRmMzGG2T5acqO2od7WL7-8F1wVRTp9mfNvg9Sg@mail.gmail.com> from "Siva Chandra" at Oct 20, 2014 12:11:45 PM

Siva Chandra wrote:

> When evaluating method calls under EVAL_SKIP, the "object" and the
> arguments to the method should also be evaluated under EVAL_SKIP,
> instead of skipping to evaluate them. Getting this right fixes PR
> c++/17494.

OK, this makes sense.

>gdb/ChangeLog:
>
>2014-10-20  Siva Chandra Reddy  <sivachandra@google.com>
>
>        PR c++/17494
>        * eval.c (evaluate_subexp_standard): Evaluate the "object" and
>        the method args also under EVAL_SKIP when evaluating method
>        calls under EVAL_SKIP.
>
>gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>2014-10-20  Siva Chandra Reddy  <sivachandra@google.com>
>
>        PR c++/17494
>        * gdb.cp/pr17494.cc: New file.
>        * gdb.cp/pr17494.exp: New file.

This is OK.

Thanks,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-03 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-20 19:11 Siva Chandra
2014-10-27 17:22 ` Siva Chandra
2014-11-03 14:35 ` Siva Chandra
2014-11-03 15:08 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2014-11-04  2:08   ` Siva Chandra
2014-11-05  0:24     ` Alan Modra
2014-11-05  0:33       ` Siva Chandra
2014-11-05 11:00       ` James Greenhalgh
2014-11-05 12:54         ` Alan Modra
2014-11-10 14:24           ` [push] Work around GCC bug 63748 (Re: [PATCH] PR c++/17494 - Fix evaluation of method calls under EVAL_SKIP) Ulrich Weigand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201411031508.sA3F815b024788@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=sivachandra@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).