public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: David Taylor <dtaylor@emc.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFA bug fix -- x86-64 stabs and deprecated fp register
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141130152036.GC4882@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3508.1416603484@usendtaylorx2l>

David,

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 03:58:04PM -0500, David Taylor wrote:
> Sometimes when using STABS on x86-64 GNU/Linux, GDB does not know which
> register to use for the frame pointer and as a result offsets from the
> frame pointer are treated as absolute addresses rather than as
> offsets...
> 
> This patch provides a default for when the debug information doesn't
> specify which register to use.
> 
> We have seen this problem when debugging problems with a previous
> release of our software (I believe it was built with GCC 4.5.x, if that
> matters).
> 
> There were no regressions on x86-64 GNU/Linux.
> 
> 2014-11-21  David Taylor  <dtaylor@emc.com>
> 
> 	* amd64-tdep.c (amd64_init_abi): Set default frame pointer.

I don't think your patch is correct, as it is going to affect
the outcome of...

    (gdb) print $fp

... for frameless functions compiled with DWARF2. See
std-regs.c:value_of_builtin_frame_fp_reg.

If we were to apply your patch, it would unconditionally print
the contents of the %rbp register as the result, which is not
what we've been printing so far.

I wish I could suggest another approach but I haven't had to touch
stabs support in several years, now. If you provided a bit more details
as to what actually happened in the debugger and where, I might be
able to help you better.

> diff --git a/gdb/amd64-tdep.c b/gdb/amd64-tdep.c
> index e69da01..5a68c33 100644
> --- a/gdb/amd64-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/amd64-tdep.c
> @@ -3006,6 +3006,8 @@ amd64_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch *
> gdbarch)
>    set_gdbarch_ps_regnum (gdbarch, AMD64_EFLAGS_REGNUM); /* %eflags */
>    set_gdbarch_fp0_regnum (gdbarch, AMD64_ST0_REGNUM); /* %st(0) */
>  
> +  set_gdbarch_deprecated_fp_regnum (gdbarch, AMD64_RBP_REGNUM); /* %rbp */
> +
>    /* The "default" register numbering scheme for AMD64 is referred to
>       as the "DWARF Register Number Mapping" in the System V psABI.
>       The preferred debugging format for all known AMD64 targets is

-- 
Joel

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-30 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-21 20:58 David Taylor
2014-11-30 15:20 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2014-11-30 18:59   ` Mark Kettenis
2014-12-01 16:42     ` David Taylor
2014-12-03  3:19       ` Joel Brobecker
2014-12-01 16:30   ` David Taylor
2014-12-03  3:50     ` Joel Brobecker
2014-12-03 17:31       ` Doug Evans
2014-12-04  3:20         ` Joel Brobecker
2014-12-05 13:38     ` Mark Kettenis
2014-12-03  3:43 ` Doug Evans

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141130152036.GC4882@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=dtaylor@emc.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).