From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21359 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2014 14:39:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21350 invoked by uid 89); 13 Dec 2014 14:39:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 14:39:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sBDEd6gS029852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 13 Dec 2014 09:39:06 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-142.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.142]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sBDEd2qm026417 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 13 Dec 2014 09:39:05 -0500 Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 14:39:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [commit] [patch+7.8] Fix 7.8 regression: resolve_dynamic_struct: Assertion `TYPE_NFIELDS (type) > 0' (PR 17642) Message-ID: <20141213143902.GA9587@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20141125195444.GA3400@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20141213142351.GG5457@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141213142351.GG5457@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00313.txt.bz2 On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 15:23:51 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Ok for 7.8 as well, although the chances of a 7.8.2 are getting slimmer, and > you'll need also to create a PR. The PR already exists, I was aware 7.8.2 won't happen but I had some downstream 7.8 branches maintenance reasons for it but... I just haven't checked it into the 7.8 branch as you are right it really does not make sense. > /* Before trying to resolve TYPE, make sure it is not a stub. */ Yes, I am fine with this comment, used it. Checked in: 5537b577695dd5cd72395590d7ebd7aa92ee856a Thanks, Jan