From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2862 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2014 15:21:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2838 invoked by uid 89); 15 Dec 2014 15:21:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:21:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sBFFLMM2006619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:21:22 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-142.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.142]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sBFFLJdU019499 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:21:21 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:21:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch+7.8] Fix 7.8 regression: resolve_dynamic_struct: Assertion `TYPE_NFIELDS (type) > 0' (PR 17642) Message-ID: <20141215152118.GA6417@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20141125195444.GA3400@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20141213142351.GG5457@adacore.com> <20141215150609.GA4229@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141215150609.GA4229@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00394.txt.bz2 On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:06:09 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote: > ... which I had forgotten about, and makes debugging on sparc > completely broken with GCC 4.9. Combined with your patch, we might > want to produce a 7.8.2 after all. So, if you'd like, you could > push your patch on the branch as well. BTW working now on 7.8 regression wrt ignored "q" abort for "bt" more-prompt so that one always has to backtrace all the hundreds of frames OTOH without backported all the acceleration fixes and even the still pending [patchv2] Fix 100x slowdown regression on DWZ files https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-10/msg00031.html one would not wait 5 minutes for a backtrace anyway so not sure if 7.8* releases incl. FSF GDB HEAD make sense. Jan