From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 467 invoked by alias); 24 Dec 2014 17:12:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 324 invoked by uid 89); 24 Dec 2014 17:12:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 17:12:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF43116449; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:12:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 34qEyPN-jpwh; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:12:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372C01163D8; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:12:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E345841013; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:12:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 17:12:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Doug Evans Cc: Anthony Green , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH, moxie, sim] Add mul.x and umul.x instruction support Message-ID: <20141224171222.GA14934@adacore.com> References: <87ioh1890s.fsf@moxielogic.com> <20141224134337.GR12884@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00625.txt.bz2 > Maybe as a "baby step" towards a more modern gdb, can we relax these > for the sim tree? > > Just a suggestion, I don't have a strong opinion, other than lamenting > the ways in which gdb is held back. Personally speaking, I tend to prefer variables that are declared all together, so I do not see this rule as "holding back" GDB. -- Joel