From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21429 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2015 07:29:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21418 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jan 2015 07:29:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:29:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9B61160FC; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 02:29:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id xwI+MtOPBl4c; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 02:29:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CF4116511; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 02:29:48 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B659D48E8B; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:29:44 +0400 (RET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:29:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Doug Evans Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: New ARI warning Wed Jan 14 02:09:16 UTC 2015 in gdb-7.9-branch Message-ID: <20150114072944.GJ8167@adacore.com> References: <20150114020916.GA8311@sourceware.org> <20150114071638.GI8167@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00366.txt.bz2 > > This large diff is probably the result of the switch from the 7.8 > > branch to the 7.9 branch. We can ignore that one... > > Not a priority, but I'm curious. Is it a complete ARI "todo list" ? this is only a diff of the last 2 report; the "todo list" would be the ARI report itself, which is published at: https://www.sourceware.org/gdb/current/ari/ If we could clean that up completely (not necessarily by fixing it always, but by marking the existing failures), we'd have a much better chance at adding ARI checking to the pre-commit checks... -- Joel