From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 690 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2015 03:19:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 309 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jan 2015 03:18:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 03:18:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2031166C1; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:18:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8hFqJT0WwToJ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:18:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B81B1166BA; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:18:14 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BEE9248E8B; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 07:18:11 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 03:19:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Binutils , gdb-patches Subject: Re: Experimental branches Message-ID: <20150116031811.GR8167@adacore.com> References: <20141223132714.GA11973@adacore.com> <20141223180802.GP12884@adacore.com> <20141224002022.GQ12884@adacore.com> <20150115235652.GU23768@bubble.grove.modra.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150115235652.GU23768@bubble.grove.modra.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00447.txt.bz2 > Joel, can you turn off emails on all users branches? > See https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2015-01/ > I don't think these emails are very useful. That was the plan; just a configuration typo. > We also seem to be getting a full diff on binutils-cvs rather than the > summary we used to have. That one is actually intentional. I really think that those diffs are really useful - at least to me - and this was discussed a bit when I made the proposal to switch to the new hooks. Do you think they are a problem? -- Joel