From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29460 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2015 03:24:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29430 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jan 2015 03:24:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-pd0-f176.google.com Received: from mail-pd0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-pd0-f176.google.com) (209.85.192.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 03:24:53 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id r10so26171622pdi.7; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:24:51 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.141.165 with SMTP id rp5mr27933683pab.102.1421465091517; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:24:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from bubble.grove.modra.org (CPE-58-160-155-134.oycza5.sa.bigpond.net.au. [58.160.155.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ms4sm5269117pbc.92.2015.01.16.19.24.50 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:24:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by bubble.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E026AEA384F; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:54:45 +1030 (ACDT) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 03:24:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Binutils , gdb-patches Subject: Re: Experimental branches Message-ID: <20150117032445.GA23768@bubble.grove.modra.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Binutils , gdb-patches References: <20141223132714.GA11973@adacore.com> <20141223180802.GP12884@adacore.com> <20141224002022.GQ12884@adacore.com> <20150115235652.GU23768@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20150116031811.GR8167@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150116031811.GR8167@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00490.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:18:11AM +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > We also seem to be getting a full diff on binutils-cvs rather than the > > summary we used to have. > > That one is actually intentional. I really think that those diffs > are really useful - at least to me - and this was discussed a bit > when I made the proposal to switch to the new hooks. Do you think > they are a problem? Not a problem, just not terribly useful. Patches are supposed to be posted to binutils (hi Nick!) before or when committing so why duplicate the diff on binutils-cvs? -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM