From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18094 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2015 03:50:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18082 invoked by uid 89); 2 Feb 2015 03:50:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 03:50:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC9E116384; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 22:50:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id USfOMHd1j6ng; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 22:50:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E96116478; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 22:50:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7854F40EBF; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 07:50:01 +0400 (RET) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 03:50:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andreas Arnez Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves , Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH 0/3] Fix for PR 17808 and some related changes Message-ID: <20150202035001.GH4525@adacore.com> References: <87vbjp60kw.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vbjp60kw.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 04:58:07PM +0100, Andreas Arnez wrote: > Ping: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-01/msg00424.html > > Pedro commented already, as shown below. Mark has not replied so far. > > Note that the PR is on the TODO list for 7.9. In my opinion at least > patch 1 should go in 7.9; it's fairly harmless and should fix the PR. > Patch 2 fixes a similar problem, but there might be a test gap, because > I currently don't have access to appropriate test hardware (with AVX and > AVX-512). And with patch 3 there's a slight chance of introducing bogus > warnings when reading core files. Thus I'd suggest to push all three > patches upstream, but only patch 1 into 7.9. OK? Let's give it another week for additional comments (or request for more time to review), and then push it to master. For 7.9, let's confirm your assessment with Pedro. It sounds pretty good to me. -- Joel