From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23033 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2015 04:11:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23000 invoked by uid 89); 4 Feb 2015 04:11:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:11:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268651165CD; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 23:11:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8HnMnvgBHYoQ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 23:11:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA21A116581; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 23:11:31 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5AAC44100E; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:11:29 +0400 (RET) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:11:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Doug Evans , gdb-patches , Phil Muldoon , arnez@vnet.linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: GDB 7.9 release update Message-ID: <20150204041129.GN4525@adacore.com> References: <20150127043704.GB4697@adacore.com> <20150129045344.GC5193@adacore.com> <54D0DA28.9080500@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54D0DA28.9080500@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 > > I am also wondering if we should also wait for... > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17837 ... or not. > > Pedro, I see you've been kind enough to start looking into this > > (bugzilla papertrail). What do you think? Blocker, not blocker? > > I'm not sure. I haven't fully understood what the scripts in > question are doing and how the issue triggers. I've asked Jan > if he could come up with a simplified reproducer. Hopefully we'll > have a better idea soon. OK. Thanks a lot for looking into this for us, Pedro. I've added this item to the list as a "maybe". > There was also this: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-01/msg00703.html > > The issue there is that with both remote and record targets, GDB > can get messed up after 'query'. That's a regression compared > to 7.8. > > I think I'll go push that series to master ASAP. I'll wait for > feedback on the plan before pushing into 7.9 though. I've added this as a maybe as well. The patches are a little large, but don't necessarily seem scary, and if the failure is bad enough... I think you'll have the best perspective to make the call. We will wait for feedback if we have to. We still have a little extra time regardless, as I don't see much activity on https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17716 I'm not too surprised. I think Phil said he was going to be traveling too. Thanks, Pedro! -- Joel