From: Tobias Burnus <tobias.burnus@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Keven Boell <keven.boell@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, sanimir.agovic@intel.com,
Keven Boell <keven.boell@intel.com>
Subject: Re: PING: [V3 00/21] Fortran dynamic array support
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 13:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150204132224.GA31304@physik.fu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5486C8B3.9000102@linux.intel.com>
Hi Joel,
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:02:27AM +0100, Keven Boell wrote:
> On 09.12.2014 10:18, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> >> Given that it is now almost mid of December: do you foresee to have
> >> some time for the patches in the foreseeable future?
> >
> > For Dec/Jan, it'll have to be during my weekends, but I will try
> > to give it some time. Please avoid patch series that are too long.
> > As much as possible, try to send one or two patches with the
> > corresponding testcase update. The idea is that we make progress
> > one step at a time, and each time I have the testcase to better
> > see what the patch is about. A big patch series with lots of code
> > changes first, followed by lots of testcase updates, just makes
> > things harder to review, and forces me to postpone it until I feel
> > I have big enough of a window to start the review (aka "never").
> Thanks for the information. I'll try to split the patch series into
> smaller parts wherever it is possible.
As I saw, Keven has split them into parts in mid January:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-01/threads.html#00376
Any estimate when you have time to start reviewing them piecewise?
Or other comments?
I think it would be great if 7.10 (8.0?) would support Fortran 90
code out of the box.
* * *
Side note: Looking at GCC's include/dwarf2.def, I see
DW_TAG (DW_TAG_atomic_type, 0x47)
which is not yet in binutils-gdb, cf.
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-01/msg00653.html
Also upcoming is the support for DW_LANG_Fortran03/08, cf.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-01/msg00177.html
Tobias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-04 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-10 9:22 Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 19/21] test: basic MI test for the " Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 07/21] vla: changed string length semantic Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 08/21] vla: get Fortran dynamic strings working Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 16/21] test: dynamic arrays passed to functions Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 04/21] vla: reconstruct value to compute bounds of target type Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 11/21] test: basic tests for dynamic array evaluations in Fortran Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 10/21] vla: add NEWS entry for dynamic array support Keven Boell
2014-09-10 17:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 12/21] test: evaluate dynamic arrays using Fortran primitives Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 17/21] test: accessing dynamic array history values Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 06/21] vla: get dynamic array corner cases to work Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 20/21] test: test sizeof for dynamic fortran arrays Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 01/21] vla: introduce allocated/associated flags Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 03/21] vla: make field selection work with vla Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 13/21] test: dynamic arrays passed to subroutines Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 15/21] test: evaluating allocation/association status Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 21/21] test: stride support for dynamic arrays Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 09/21] vla: add stride support to fortran arrays Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 05/21] vla: use value constructor instead of raw-buffer manipulation Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 02/21] vla: make dynamic fortran arrays functional Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 18/21] test: dynamic string evaluations Keven Boell
2014-09-10 9:22 ` [V3 14/21] test: correct ptype of dynamic arrays in Fortran Keven Boell
2014-10-02 8:35 ` PING: [V3 00/21] Fortran dynamic array support Tobias Burnus
2014-10-02 15:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-11-17 8:59 ` Tobias Burnus
2014-11-17 10:05 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-12-09 8:00 ` Tobias Burnus
2014-12-09 9:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-12-09 10:03 ` Keven Boell
2015-02-04 13:22 ` Tobias Burnus [this message]
2015-02-04 14:18 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150204132224.GA31304@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--to=tobias.burnus@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=keven.boell@intel.com \
--cc=keven.boell@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sanimir.agovic@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).