From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9734 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2015 19:34:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9720 invoked by uid 89); 4 Feb 2015 19:34:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 19:34:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t14JYcA8001564 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 14:34:38 -0500 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-113.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.113]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t14JYHK1016254 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 14:34:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 19:34:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Paul_Koning@dell.com Subject: [commit] [patchv2] Fix Python 3 build error on 32-bit hosts Message-ID: <20150204193417.GA12728@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20150204174311.GA24375@host1.jankratochvil.net> <54D26BCA.2000505@redhat.com> <20150204192028.GA12310@host1.jankratochvil.net> <54D27294.8010009@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54D27294.8010009@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2 On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 20:27:16 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > Distros will be backporting Python fixes, not API/ABI breaking changes. Adding a new typedef (in the library namespace) I do not find as an API breakage (for correctly written applications). > OK. Checked in: 881d5d5db08ee6b343e1f1fc560d785fed29428e Thanks, Jan