From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8576 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2015 03:09:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8515 invoked by uid 89); 20 Feb 2015 03:09:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 03:09:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5055B1167CD; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:09:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ZKYPSZpuAdMr; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:09:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E211164E7; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:09:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 510AB40EAD; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 07:09:55 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 03:09:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andreas Arnez Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH 0/3] Fix for PR 17808 and some related changes Message-ID: <20150220030955.GA21380@adacore.com> References: <87vbjp60kw.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> <20150202035001.GH4525@adacore.com> <54D0D8CB.7000509@redhat.com> <20150204035942.GM4525@adacore.com> <87iofhwnns.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87iofhwnns.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00586.txt.bz2 > >> Sounds good to me, but I have a counter proposal. > >> > >> How about we push it all to master now? That'd give it exposure on > >> both auto testers and on others' machines immediately. We can always > >> address any additional comments as follow ups, of course. The main > >> difference is that the series would be exposed to testing one > >> extra week. Then if we see no fall out, we'd have a little more > >> confidence pushing to 7.9. > > > > Sounds even better to me. > > > > Andreas, please push your changes now. > > Done. Thanks for your support! And, for the record, I have just pushed the patch to gdb-7.9-branch as well. Given that I was not having my best day yesterday, I re- tested the patch on x86_64-linux before pushing. -- Joel