From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 110335 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2015 13:16:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 110325 invoked by uid 89); 11 Mar 2015 13:16:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:16:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t2BDG2F7002454 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:16:03 -0400 Received: from blade.nx (ovpn-116-20.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.20]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t2BDG2iF008637; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:16:02 -0400 Received: by blade.nx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 79017265072; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:16:01 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:16:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Pedro Alves Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] Implement remote_bfd_iovec_stat Message-ID: <20150311131601.GA5952@blade.nx> References: <55002568.1050305@redhat.com> <1426078708-3044-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1426078708-3044-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00285.txt.bz2 Gary Benson wrote: > Pedro Alves wrote: > > On 03/11/2015 10:23 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > > > Are you ok for me to commit this patch, reordered before the > > > gdbserver changes, with extract_unsigned_integer used in > > > remote_fileio_to_host_{uint,ulong}, and that comment added? > > > > It be easier for me to just see the patch before answering, but I > > think I am, though I'd like to take another look at the docs patch > > with everything combined, to cross check whether more bits would be > > missing. > > Ok, here goes: [snip] Actually, it occurred to me that with the patch reordering the docs all ought to be in the patch that adds the GDB side, so, ignore the one I just sent, I'll redo them both. Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/