From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 101934 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2015 22:33:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 101915 invoked by uid 89); 22 Mar 2015 22:33:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.gentoo.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:33:39 +0000 Received: from vapier (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D05A34098A; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:33:00 -0000 From: Mike Frysinger To: Joel Brobecker Cc: James Bowman , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH, FT32] gdb and sim support Message-ID: <20150323023255.GA8039@vapier> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , James Bowman , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <20150224045154.GE13523@vapier> <20150317173615.GC7494@adacore.com> <20150319185452.GA14215@vapier> <20150320124600.GA5273@adacore.com> <20150320154715.GI11803@vapier> <20150320155053.GB5273@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150320155053.GB5273@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00702.txt.bz2 --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 698 On 20 Mar 2015 11:50, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > > 2015-03-19 James Bowman > > > >=20 > > > > * sim-ft32.h: New file, FT32 simulator/GDB interface. > > >=20 > > > Shouldn't this part of the "sim" patch? (which means that the GDB > > > part would be conditional on the "sim" part being pushed first). > >=20 > > only gdb uses this header to interface with the sim directly, so it cou= ld go=20 > > either way >=20 > Doesn't the sim need that header too - I would think the point of > having the definitions be there would be to make sure that sim and > GDB are in sync? the sim currently duplicates the defines, but it prob should include it dir= ectly -mike --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVD3tXAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBlhwP/1ShnmNuG8pJQe8ksHEaNPaV hZalSLmpamgBp28x4+SRPSVq+T3PKfVjCQrRrc4A6K7GMMxZpzx0Ozuv5FWZknM4 LC90XOC0v4bUNsefbY14Hh8NuSmnkO9tnyOcZo3bfW8lUumEU9ich7IlGzLimtbn CrfEZU8a0sXlGrS7MArlId1Ljfs5dqjaeUpTPxCeO9TjDGmXPcRq61bv2hkUzdNj 9HupVcAr5k872TYx2ox2lcKTAV2Bv48OF8xFED57qVfpoZ+MciyuvO8K5eLb76mA 4QeeTpmiXsDrp72YP1r/Hq991I6YhQki41yBN0W5aQCdmdXFjw3afQz4M72mFhMn 62cnG1MC23GUw2ZopdYrRZnasMu/l6BHAZ8uX3DTA6Xmg2+VOFUqdtaDcp9cbT9X 3Tj2tziFcJFSPO/GmC7mTjG0sqlKpjHHa/TOkk6fzSXfdsgy+Z2XyHt3piq9NwYN bm8mv09tjPigSxm6zlGuB8TZL4VIYWz2XtmRs5HN8XMdGLux+H55XMos/AB9fSzf 6pvTDajrmgk6GMYtO0RpWzj2jTZtCMnxqtJFRwARL4HyKzfO0fY7LqxedKvv1xjF eIsSzpxeznFT0UMeMdAAObrTN7fXKYb//06Z9i4r0+15AsS/GrwaGhw5ql84m8OZ BRx/l9oqIm0G55LJo+Zk =Y/5R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--