From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4703 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2015 12:36:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4690 invoked by uid 89); 23 Mar 2015 12:36:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:36:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54A9116312; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 08:36:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 0Q9jHPxrCq0s; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 08:36:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3A31162FF; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 08:36:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C89BF40EAD; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 05:36:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:36:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: James Bowman , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH, FT32] gdb and sim support Message-ID: <20150323123647.GB5438@adacore.com> References: <20150224045154.GE13523@vapier> <20150317173615.GC7494@adacore.com> <20150319185452.GA14215@vapier> <20150320124600.GA5273@adacore.com> <20150320154715.GI11803@vapier> <20150320155053.GB5273@adacore.com> <20150323023255.GA8039@vapier> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150323023255.GA8039@vapier> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00714.txt.bz2 > > Doesn't the sim need that header too - I would think the point of > > having the definitions be there would be to make sure that sim and > > GDB are in sync? > > the sim currently duplicates the defines, but it prob should include > it directly Oy! I didn't realize that the definitions were duplicated. Yes, indeed, let's make sure the sim and gdb both use the same defines. -- Joel