From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 54098 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2015 17:14:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 54006 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2015 17:14:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:14:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84631D3AA1; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:14:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Ys3r74tpWgWq; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:14:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F5CD3D8F; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:14:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 064B040EAD; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:14:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:14:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: 3 weeks to GDB 7.9.1 release? Message-ID: <20150422171434.GL4764@adacore.com> References: <20150422133231.GB4764@adacore.com> <000e01d07d10$194b7a30$4be26e90$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000e01d07d10$194b7a30$4be26e90$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00827.txt.bz2 > Would the patch to gdb/p-exp.y that fixes issue PR 127815 > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17815 > > be acceptable without the testsuite change? > > This patch was accepted recently by Doug, and committed to trunk. > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-04/msg00735.html > > The patch [part 1/3] itself is at: > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-02/msg00111.html > > Or would the application of the three parts of the patch be more acceptable? > The two other parts are at: > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-02/msg00112.html > and > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-02/msg00113.html It's mostly your's and Doug's decision. The general idea is to only take patches that are safe and fix an important issue. But if it's only affecting Pascal, then we can be a little more relaxed about it. Regarding the testsuite patches, since they cannot harm the debugger, they should be part of the set being considered for inclusion in the gdb-7.9-branch. If the decision is to include the patch, please remember to update the wiki page as well! -- Joel