From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22358 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2015 17:54:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22346 invoked by uid 89); 27 Apr 2015 17:54:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:54:50 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3RHsnFl013959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:54:49 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-27.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.27]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3RHsjWH013192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:54:48 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:54:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Phil Muldoon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] compile: Add 'set compile-gcc' Message-ID: <20150427175445.GA12679@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20150423203402.23140.92757.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20150423203413.23140.35224.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20150423210815.GA8626@host1.jankratochvil.net> <553E5A1E.5000003@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <553E5A1E.5000003@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01006.txt.bz2 On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:47:42 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > IIUC, gdb will always apply the same search as when this is set > empty? That is, the user can also set this to a regex. So it seems to me > that the documentation (manual and help) doesn't match the implementation? That it can be also a regex is an API bug because I wanted to make a minimal API change. Rather than officially documenting such bug I find then better to rather make a proper complex change to the API. Given that you requested an API rework anyway I will try to post the new API even with this change. Thanks, Jan