public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] compile: New 'compile print'
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 19:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150506191816.GA12839@host1.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <554A20F3.1010404@redhat.com>

On Wed, 06 May 2015 16:10:59 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 05/06/2015 01:23 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > This is all a hack how to get it working for live targets without implementing
> > the compiler IR (intermediate representation) interpreter in GDB (making
> > 'compile' commands compatible with core files). So far AFAIK C++ live
> > functionality has been a top priority, not the IR interpreter.  This
> > COMPILE_I_PRINT_ADDRESS_SCOPE-or-COMPILE_I_PRINT_VALUE_SCOPE conditional would
> > be some simple runtime conditional in the IR interpreter instead.
> > 
> > If an implementation on top of IR interpreter is required for these patches
> > then this whole patch series should be dropped and we need to start to work on
> > the IR interpreter instead.
> 
> No, IR interpreter is certainly not a requirement.

IIUC in this case the hack has an acceptable scale (contrary to that printf).


> But I think the comment that explains the current implementation should
> be clear.  As is, it's just that I still don't understand what you mean by:
> 
> >    Function returns NULL only for COMPILE_I_PRINT_ADDRESS_SCOPE when
> >    COMPILE_I_PRINT_VALUE_SCOPE should have been used instead.
> 
> because reading this one wonders: "OK, if COMPILE_I_PRINT_VALUE_SCOPE should
> have been used, why wasn't it used then?  Is that a bug in the caller?"

I have put there now:
   GDB first tries to compile the code with COMPILE_I_PRINT_ADDRESS_SCOPE.
   If it finds user tries to print an array type this function returns
   NULL.  Caller will then regenerate the code with
   COMPILE_I_PRINT_VALUE_SCOPE, recompiles it again and finally runs it.
   This is because __auto_type array-to-pointer type conversion of
   COMPILE_I_EXPR_VAL which gets detected by COMPILE_I_EXPR_PTR_TYPE
   preserving the array type.  */

Plus at:
enum compile_i_scope_types
       name already specifies its address.  See get_out_value_type.  */
    COMPILE_I_PRINT_ADDRESS_SCOPE,
    COMPILE_I_PRINT_VALUE_SCOPE, 


Jan

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-06 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-11 19:43 [PATCH v3 0/9] compile: compile print&printf Jan Kratochvil
2015-04-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] Code cleanup: Make parts of print_command_1 public Jan Kratochvil
2015-04-29 15:44   ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-30  0:24     ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-04-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] Code cleanup: compile: Constify some parameters Jan Kratochvil
2015-04-29 15:47   ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-06 18:58     ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-04-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] compile: Distribute scope, add scope_data Jan Kratochvil
2015-04-29 15:44   ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] Code cleanup: compile: func_addr -> func_sym Jan Kratochvil
2015-04-29 15:52   ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] compile: compile printf: gdbserver support Jan Kratochvil
2015-04-26  9:33   ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-04-29 18:19     ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-03 14:06       ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-06 10:22         ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-29 16:12   ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] compile: New compile printf Jan Kratochvil
2015-04-29 15:54   ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-03 14:06     ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-06 10:22       ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-06 11:30         ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-06 11:47           ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] compile: Support relocation to GNU-IFUNCs Jan Kratochvil
2015-04-29 15:48   ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-06 19:00     ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-04-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] compile: Use -Wall, not -w Jan Kratochvil
2015-04-29 15:49   ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-03 14:05     ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-06 10:21       ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] compile: New 'compile print' Jan Kratochvil
2015-04-29 15:53   ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-03 14:06     ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-06 10:22       ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-06 12:23         ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-06 14:11           ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-06 19:18             ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2015-05-15 16:35               ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150506191816.GA12839@host1.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).