From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14373 invoked by alias); 15 May 2015 20:01:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14361 invoked by uid 89); 15 May 2015 20:01:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 15 May 2015 20:01:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFD228A2E; Fri, 15 May 2015 16:01:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3+j1XhmawjpD; Fri, 15 May 2015 16:01:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E1728A38; Fri, 15 May 2015 16:01:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DD75B40DAA; Fri, 15 May 2015 13:01:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 20:01:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Gary Benson , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Descriptive subjects Message-ID: <20150515200116.GA14956@adacore.com> References: <20150515075915.GA14783@blade.nx> <5555DA64.9030101@redhat.com> <20150515122844.GK4767@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150515122844.GK4767@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00413.txt.bz2 > +1. In fact, I would even suggest that we follow that guideline > for revision logs as well. When going through the log trying to > identify the commits that might be responsible for a change in > behavior, "PR bla/12345" is not very helpful for that. Something that occured to me a little after I sent the email: I suspect that using the PR's subject would often work as a good subject for the commit. -- Joel