From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7111 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2015 11:54:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7100 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jun 2015 11:54:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:54:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187F228A99; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 07:54:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id IOx-9faB41Br; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 07:54:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0910128916; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 07:54:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 772D84419B; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 07:54:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:54:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: "Tedeschi, Walfred" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [pushed] [PATCH V4] Add support for bound table in the Intel MPX context. Message-ID: <20150610115430.GA11014@adacore.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00173.txt.bz2 > I followed your suggestion and pushed as considering that the rest was ok. > Hope this is fine. This isn't exactly how I meant it, but that's fine :-). I saw that you pushed the ChangeLog entries separately. I assume this was just an oversight? Normally, we'd ask that they be pushed within the corresponding commit. Just making sure... -- Joel