On Wed, 2015-06-10 11:56:35 +0000, Tedeschi, Walfred <walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> wrote:
> Yes!
> 
> I am sorry, for that. 
> BTW: Also got a message from BUILDBOT that I caused issues on 32bit builds.
> I am working to fix it!

Additional to what GDB'ish BUILDBOT may have found, I also see general
breakages due to a wrongly moved @end table in the docs (just a first
glance, I'm not sure so I'm not promoting an own patch to fix it.)

See eg.
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=445996

 makeinfo --split-size=5000000  -DHAVE_MAKEINFO_CLICK -I /home/jbglaw/repos/binutils_gdb/gdb/doc/../../readline/doc -I /home/jbglaw/repos/binutils_gdb/gdb/doc/../mi -I /home/jbglaw/repos/binutils_gdb/gdb/doc \
-o gdb.info /home/jbglaw/repos/binutils_gdb/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
/home/jbglaw/repos/binutils_gdb/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo:22136: @subsubsection seen before @end table
/home/jbglaw/repos/binutils_gdb/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo:22175: @item outside of table or list
/home/jbglaw/repos/binutils_gdb/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo:22179: @item outside of table or list
/home/jbglaw/repos/binutils_gdb/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo:22185: unmatched `@end table'
Makefile:486: recipe for target 'gdb.info' failed
make[4]: *** [gdb.info] Error 1

MfG, JBG

-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      jbglaw@lug-owl.de              +49-172-7608481
Signature of:         Alles wird gut! ...und heute wirds schon ein bißchen besser.
the second  :