From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20117 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2015 14:17:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 20104 invoked by uid 89); 1 Jul 2015 14:17:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 14:17:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3764BE268 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 14:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-41.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.41]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t61EH4sf007911 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:17:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 14:17:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Phil Muldoon Subject: Re: [patch] debug compile: Replace confusing debug message Message-ID: <20150701141703.GA20031@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20150701122048.GA7170@host1.jankratochvil.net> <5593F4CE.8030605@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5593F4CE.8030605@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:10:22 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > OK. > > On 07/01/2015 01:20 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > > if (strcmp (sym->name, "_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_") == 0) > > { > > It'd be nice to have a comment here mentioning why we need to do this. I do not know, I think it is a GCC bug, with -mcmodel=large I have no idea why GCC needs _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_. I can write there this info. Jan