From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 98965 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2015 10:23:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 98955 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jul 2015 10:23:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 10:23:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3095ABB968; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 10:23:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blade.nx (ovpn-116-52.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.52]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t63ANIgm028079; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 06:23:18 -0400 Received: by blade.nx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 27ECC2643ED; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:23:17 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 10:23:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 7.10 new branching date: Jun 29th, 2015 Message-ID: <20150703102317.GA10013@blade.nx> References: <20150601213709.GC2631@adacore.com> <20150615135805.GA28342@adacore.com> <86si96o8si.fsf@gmail.com> <20150702171839.GB3125@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150702171839.GB3125@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: > > When will we create the branch? > > How about today? There was one pending item, but it got moved to > the "maybe" section of the 7.10 release TODO. So we should be good > to go. > > I was really hoping that the patch issuing a warning when a > discrepancy between objfile being loaded in memory and actual > executable being debug is detected would make it... I'm wondering > where we are at with this one! Is that the attach-attach series (make user-specified filenames sticky)? I'm sorry, I didn't realize you were waiting for it. I don't have anything ready to go and I'm on vacation for a week after today. I'll see what I can do now... Gary -- http://gbenson.net/