From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9972 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2015 16:37:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9957 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jul 2015 16:37:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 16:37:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4283B11635F; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:37:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id zuS+bTO3dY2y; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:37:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1627528D88; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:37:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A5E11406C0; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 09:37:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 16:37:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Yao Qi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 7.10 new branching date: Jun 29th, 2015 Message-ID: <20150706163718.GE3125@adacore.com> References: <20150601213709.GC2631@adacore.com> <20150615135805.GA28342@adacore.com> <86si96o8si.fsf@gmail.com> <20150702171839.GB3125@adacore.com> <86k2udo81l.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86k2udo81l.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 > > I was really hoping that the patch issuing a warning when a discrepancy > > between objfile being loaded in memory and actual executable being > > debug is detected would make it... I'm wondering where we are at with > > this one! > > Do you have a link about these patches? According to your description > here, I feel it is a useful feature, but not critical that we must > include it in 7.10 release. Agreed. I will probably create the branch later today. -- Joel