From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-124355-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 92268 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2015 08:21:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 92258 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jul 2015 08:21:35 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:21:34 +0000
Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26])	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65D03A2C0C;	Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:21:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-41.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.41])	by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t6F8LROV006527	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);	Wed, 15 Jul 2015 04:21:30 -0400
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:21:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,        gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,        Aleksandar Ristovski <ARistovski@qnx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 09/10] Validate symbol file using build-id
Message-ID: <20150715082127.GA21338@host1.jankratochvil.net>
References: <20150621101644.GA12733@host1.jankratochvil.net> <CADPb22TH5nfFSkCzW9cCiHuoJFAG+P5z=qZawgwGUgYQ5kfd5Q@mail.gmail.com> <20150623204702.GA2156@host1.jankratochvil.net> <559D3749.9010200@redhat.com> <20150712190921.GA8682@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20150712192911.GB12553@host1.jankratochvil.net> <83vbdp8846.fsf@gnu.org> <55A39439.1090803@redhat.com> <20150713123835.GA2529@host1.jankratochvil.net> <CADPb22TLu1FW=DXaECJv2fwR5er4ZLPQwm4o1kaCWDgC4HdtVQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22TLu1FW=DXaECJv2fwR5er4ZLPQwm4o1kaCWDgC4HdtVQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00426.txt.bz2

On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:13:26 +0200, Doug Evans wrote:
> So I'd be ok with just adding a simple note somewhere saying
> the option only applies to solibs at the moment and will
> eventually also apply to exes.

So the option is now called 'validate-build-id'.

Its description everywhere (NEWS+gdb.texinfo+'help set validate-build-id')
talks about shared library now.  Is it OK this way or should it be changed?


Jan