From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 117374 invoked by alias); 6 May 2016 16:09:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 117361 invoked by uid 89); 6 May 2016 16:09:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 06 May 2016 16:08:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DE04804E7 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 16:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pinnacle.lan (ovpn-113-39.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.39]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u46G8nv9030044 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 12:08:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 16:09:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] AndesTech NDS32 port Message-ID: <20160506090845.10123457@pinnacle.lan> In-Reply-To: <86eg9fcuy8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <3561f390-ea41-2ee3-a5a9-d870429497c3@gmail.com> <20160505164641.3cac5f17@pinnacle.lan> <86eg9fcuy8.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 On Fri, 06 May 2016 12:00:31 +0100 Yao Qi wrote: > Kevin Buettner writes: > > > Ditto for this copyright too. (On the other hand, if it was actually > > published in some form back in any form in 2012, disregard my comments > > regarding copyright.) > > The patch was posted at least in 2013. > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-07/msg00223.html Well, in that case, Yan-Ting Lin should leave the copyright dates alone. Kevin