From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 100943 invoked by alias); 29 May 2016 14:12:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 100926 invoked by uid 89); 29 May 2016 14:12:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:653, gdbpatches X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 29 May 2016 14:12:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8181FC05B1DB; Sun, 29 May 2016 14:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-44.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.44]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u4TECOoi025856 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 29 May 2016 10:12:27 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 14:12:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker Subject: obsolete: [patch] PR 15231: import bare DW_TAG_lexical_block Message-ID: <20160529141224.GC13685@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20160514193003.GA9775@host1.jankratochvil.net> <2cebffca-be7d-f61d-911c-559e67c4270d@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cebffca-be7d-f61d-911c-559e67c4270d@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00521.txt.bz2 On Fri, 27 May 2016 17:35:22 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 05/14/2016 08:30 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > > I agree that my dwarf2_get_pc_bounds() extension is ugly. > > Can you make it not ugly? Done, newly posted as: [patch 1/2] Code cleanup: dwarf2_get_pc_bounds: -1/0/+1 -> enum https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-05/msg00519.html Message-ID: <20160529141035.GA13685@host1.jankratochvil.net> + [patchv2 2/2] PR 15231: import bare DW_TAG_lexical_block https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-05/msg00520.html Message-ID: <20160529141043.GB13685@host1.jankratochvil.net> Jan