From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 51911 invoked by alias); 29 May 2016 17:50:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 51893 invoked by uid 89); 29 May 2016 17:50:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=announced, news X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 29 May 2016 17:50:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33AA781F03; Sun, 29 May 2016 17:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-44.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.44]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u4THoXki026965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 29 May 2016 13:50:35 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 17:50:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be, sergiodj@redhat.com, palves@redhat.com, xdje42@gmail.com, scox@redhat.com, jistone@redhat.com Subject: Re: [doc] NEWS: QCatchSyscalls: simplify Message-ID: <20160529175032.GA25095@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <1449196006-13759-2-git-send-email-jistone@redhat.com> <1452308954-13679-1-git-send-email-jistone@redhat.com> <20160529164745.GA21714@host1.jankratochvil.net> <8337p0ydqo.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8337p0ydqo.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00531.txt.bz2 On Sun, 29 May 2016 19:29:19 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Is it really that bad? I generally tend to let people say things in > their own words, as long as it's readable. But if you insist... That :1 and :0 was confusing to me as it is very different from all the other remote packets announced in the NEWS file, therefore I was looking at the protocol how is this packet special. How can be ':' a part of the packet name when ':' is a parameter delimiter? And I haven't found anything special on this packet. Similarly the qSupported looked special to me and again it does not seem to be anyhow special. Even "N stop reply" announced right above uses the standard template. Besides that all IMO one of the purposes of the NEWS file is to be brief. Sure I do not mind but I was reviewing a derived downstream documentation and I just found it. Jan