public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@foss.arm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	       Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>,
	       "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [1/9][RFC][DWARF] Reserve three DW_OP numbers in vendor extension space
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 19:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161111193859.GJ3541@tucnak.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72418e98-a400-c503-e8ce-c3fbe1ecc4a7@foss.arm.com>

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 06:21:48PM +0000, Jiong Wang wrote:
> This patch introduces three AARCH64 private DWARF operations in vendor extension
> space.
> 
> DW_OP_AARCH64_pauth 0xea
> ===
>   Takes one unsigned LEB 128 Pointer Authentication Description. Bits [3:0] of
>   the description contain the Authentication Action Code. All unused bits are
>   initialized to 0. The operation then proceeds according to the value of the
>   action code as described in the Action Code Table.
> 
> DW_OP_AARCH64_paciasp 0xeb
> ===
>   Authenticates the contents in X30/LR register as per A key for instruction
>   pointer using current CFA as salt. The result is pushed onto the stack.
> 
> DW_OP_AARCH64_paciasp_deref 0xec
> ===
>   Takes one signed LEB128 offset and retrieves 8-byte contents from the address
>   calculated by CFA plus this offset, the contents then authenticated as per A
>   key for instruction pointer using current CFA as salt. The result is pushed
>   onto the stack.

I'd like to point out that especially the vendor range of DW_OP_* is
extremely scarce resource, we have only a couple of unused values, so taking
3 out of the remaining unused 12 for a single architecture is IMHO too much.
Can't you use just a single opcode and encode which of the 3 operations it is
in say the low 2 bits of a LEB 128 operand?
We'll likely need to do RSN some multiplexing even for the generic GNU
opcodes if we need just a few further ones (say 0xff as an extension,
followed by uleb128 containing the opcode - 0xff).
In the non-vendor area we still have 54 values left, so there is more space
for future expansion.

	Jakub

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-11 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <c9da17a6-c3de-4466-c023-4e4ddbe38efb@foss.arm.com>
2016-11-11 18:22 ` Jiong Wang
2016-11-11 19:39   ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2016-11-15 16:00     ` Jiong Wang
2016-11-15 16:18       ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-11-15 16:48         ` Jiong Wang
2016-11-15 19:25           ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2016-11-16 10:00             ` Jiong Wang
2016-11-16 13:55               ` Mark Wielaard
2016-11-16 14:02                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-11-30 11:15                   ` Jiong Wang
2016-11-30 18:25                     ` Yao Qi
2016-12-12 13:40                     ` [Ping~][1/9][RFC][DWARF] " Jiong Wang
2016-12-19 13:59                       ` [Ping^2][1/9][RFC][DWARF] " Jiong Wang
2016-12-28 18:21                         ` [Ping^3][1/9][RFC][DWARF] " Jiong Wang
2016-12-28 19:54                     ` [1/9][RFC][DWARF] " Cary Coutant
2017-01-03  9:32                       ` Jiong Wang
2017-01-03 10:10                       ` Jiong Wang
2017-01-03 10:57                         ` Yao Qi
2017-01-03 15:21                           ` Nick Clifton
2017-01-03 17:47                             ` Yao Qi
2016-11-30 21:44                   ` Cary Coutant
2016-12-01 10:42                     ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2016-12-01 11:09                       ` Jiong Wang
2016-11-15 16:51         ` Jiong Wang
2016-12-28 19:48     ` Cary Coutant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161111193859.GJ3541@tucnak.redhat.com \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jiong.wang@foss.arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).