public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: coypu@sdf.org
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Adjust fallback definition of DBREG_DRX for netbsd
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170629153752.GA19263@SDF.ORG> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1693366.iCsyRdA5ot@ralph.baldwin.cx>

On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 10:43:24AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, June 05, 2017 12:07:37 PM coypu wrote:
> > This was originally inteded for freebsd~=5. freebsd has since moved
> > to the definition here, including the rename dr0->dr.
> > 
> > netbsd now uses the same definitions as freebsd, including the use
> > of dr instead of dr0, but doesn't provide this macro.
> > ---
> >  gdb/x86-bsd-nat.c | 5 ++---
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/gdb/x86-bsd-nat.c b/gdb/x86-bsd-nat.c
> > index 2ff661c1..81bd0ad1 100644
> > --- a/gdb/x86-bsd-nat.c
> > +++ b/gdb/x86-bsd-nat.c
> > @@ -51,10 +51,9 @@ x86bsd_mourn_inferior (struct target_ops *ops)
> >    super_mourn_inferior (ops);
> >  }
> >  
> > -/* Not all versions of FreeBSD/i386 that support the debug registers
> > -   have this macro.  */
> > +/* NetBSD doesn't provide a definition of this macro */
> >  #ifndef DBREG_DRX
> > -#define DBREG_DRX(d, x) ((&d->dr0)[x])
> > +#define DBREG_DRX(d,x)  ((d)->dr[(x)])
> >  #endif
> >  
> >  static unsigned long
> 
> This is fine with me in that I don't think it's worth providing the alternate
> definition for really-old FreeBSD that used dr0.
> 

so... ping x2? why not commit it? I don't have commit access

dealing with gnu's patch mailing lists is making me want to quit being
involved with open source.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-29 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-05 12:07 coypu
2017-06-06 17:49 ` John Baldwin
2017-06-23  1:38   ` coypu
2017-07-06  0:14     ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-29 15:38   ` coypu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170629153752.GA19263@SDF.ORG \
    --to=coypu@sdf.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jhb@freebsd.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).