From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Philipp Rudo)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Andreas Arnez),
qiyaoltc@gmail.com (Yao Qi)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] Split up s390-linux-tdep.c
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 14:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180109140934.85512D804CF@oc3748833570.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180109120144.93854-1-prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> from "Philipp Rudo" at Jan 09, 2018 01:01:33 PM
Hi Philipp,
> Philipp Rudo (11):
> s390: Remove duplicate checks for cached gdbarch at init
> s390: Allocate gdbarch & tdep at start of gdbarch init
> s390: gdbarch_tdep.have_* int -> bool
> s390: gdbarch_tdep add field tdesc
> s390: Move tdesc validation to separate function
> s390: if -> gdb_assert for tdesc_has_registers check
> s390: Hook s390 into OSABI mechanism
> s390: gdbarch_tdep add hook for syscall record
> s390: Split up s390-linux-tdep.c into two files
> s390: Move record-replay to s390-tdep
> s390: Clean up s390-linux-tdep.c
I've looked over the series again, and it looks good to me now.
So unless Andreas has further comments, I think this is OK to
commit ...
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-09 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-09 12:01 Philipp Rudo
2018-01-09 12:01 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] s390: gdbarch_tdep add field tdesc Philipp Rudo
2018-01-09 12:01 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] s390: gdbarch_tdep.have_* int -> bool Philipp Rudo
2018-01-09 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] s390: Remove duplicate checks for cached gdbarch at init Philipp Rudo
2018-01-09 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] s390: gdbarch_tdep add hook for syscall record Philipp Rudo
2018-01-09 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] s390: if -> gdb_assert for tdesc_has_registers check Philipp Rudo
2018-01-09 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] s390: Move record-replay to s390-tdep Philipp Rudo
2018-01-09 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] s390: Split up s390-linux-tdep.c into two files Philipp Rudo
2018-01-09 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] s390: Clean up s390-linux-tdep.c Philipp Rudo
2018-01-09 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] s390: Hook s390 into OSABI mechanism Philipp Rudo
2018-01-09 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] s390: Move tdesc validation to separate function Philipp Rudo
2018-01-09 14:09 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2018-01-23 12:53 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] Split up s390-linux-tdep.c Andreas Arnez
2018-01-10 13:10 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] s390: Allocate gdbarch & tdep at start of gdbarch_init Philipp Rudo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180109140934.85512D804CF@oc3748833570.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).