public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
	macro@linux-mips.org, tom@tromey.com,	simon.marchi@ericsson.com
Subject: GDB 8.1 release candidate on Friday (2018-01-12)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 03:59:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180111035934.x5nosnmrfp7r6cff@adacore.com> (raw)

Hello,

Thanks to Pedro, Tom, Maciej and Simon, I think we should be
in great shape.

The following are the issues that are still existing and should
be fixed before release:

  * [Pedro] gdb/22583
    gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.exp regressions on software
    single-step tar gets

The following were recently fixed:

  * [Maciej] remote/22597
    Empty `qsThreadInfo' reply handling regression causing inability to execute

  * [Pedro/Joel] gdb/22670
    regressions in Ada caused by introduction of wild matching in
    C++ patch series

  * [SimonM] no PR
    hurd: Add enough auxv support for AT_ENTRY for PIE binaries

The following has been analyzed as a testcase issue, rather than
a real issue -- hoping for the patch to be pushed soon:

  * [TomT] no PR yet
    Regression on 32-bit: gdb.guile/scm-ports.exp [Re: [RFA 1/2]
    Fix two regress ions in scalar printing
    https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-12/msg00215.html

    Tom proposed a patch. Pedro asked for some clarification,
    Doug approved, and Tom provides some answers.

On my end, I am down to a very small number of failures when I use
AdaCore's testsuite. I still have to analyze them, but from where
I stand, only one may be related to the wild-matching series, but
I am guestimating that this is unlikely. Not blocking for the first
pre-release, IMO.

So, unless there are new issues we just discovered, I will proceed
with the first pre-release tomorrow!

-- 
Joel

             reply	other threads:[~2018-01-11  3:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-11  3:59 Joel Brobecker [this message]
2018-01-11  9:57 ` Yao Qi
2018-01-12 19:27   ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180111035934.x5nosnmrfp7r6cff@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).