From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 51006 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2018 07:39:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 50989 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jan 2018 07:39:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 07:39:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C48E117898; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 02:39:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id g5uK-STheQMO; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 02:39:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2810116C8D; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 02:39:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5363F83308; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 08:39:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 07:39:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior , Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix scm-ports.exp regression Message-ID: <20180116073924.2w4aw5pgajk4d7dx@adacore.com> References: <20180103182048.8495-1-tom@tromey.com> <37ddb96c-2b32-2fcd-9c36-17f32d8701e3@redhat.com> <87efmykhw1.fsf@tromey.com> <87po6bugv1.fsf@tromey.com> <87a7xe6dop.fsf@redhat.com> <87bmhurcwk.fsf@tromey.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bmhurcwk.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SW-Source: 2018-01/txt/msg00284.txt.bz2 > Sergio> Perhaps you meant to push this to the 8.1 branch? > > Yeah, sorry about that. > I will do it now. > I can revert on the 8.0 branch if someone wants. I am guessing the patch is correct on the 8.0 branch, even if there wasn't a fail before. I think it's fine to leave it in. -- Joel