From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2713 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2018 02:55:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2699 invoked by uid 89); 1 Mar 2018 02:55:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=you! X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 02:55:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9086C560B7; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 21:55:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8lNarKZlPwAE; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 21:55:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF33560B6; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 21:55:33 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 96BF483301; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 06:55:28 +0400 (+04) Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 02:55:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: GDB Patches , Simon Marchi , Pedro Alves Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Make gdbserver work with filename-only binaries Message-ID: <20180301025528.zyh5m5jls45t3ooa@adacore.com> References: <20180210014241.19278-3-sergiodj@redhat.com> <20180228032708.19670-1-sergiodj@redhat.com> <87sh9ka5ze.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sh9ka5ze.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SW-Source: 2018-03/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 > Simon reminded me that this patch is also a good fit for the 8.1 branch, > so I went ahead and pushed it there. > > 506817a3abd98859eb3474389e756c0253cc28a1 > 2441702a72f324e41a1624dc042b334f375e2d81 > 6d607b8812b35ff36fbbad2915696f6669f86a32 Thanks for getting this through, Sergio and Simon. Just a quick reminder that, now that the .0 is out, all new patches pushed on the branch should have a corresponding PR number, with the target milestone set to 8.1. This is to be able to give users an actionable list of PRs they can look at if they are wondering what the difference between 8.0 and 8.1 is. Is there one for this issue? If not, it's good enough to create one after the fact, as long as the PR points to the various discussions and maybe gives the SHA1 of the various commits, I think we're good. Thank you! -- Joel