From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18641 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2018 20:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17669 invoked by uid 89); 23 Mar 2018 20:55:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-25.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_0,GIT_PATCH_1,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=sk:find_pc X-HELO: gateway30.websitewelcome.com Received: from gateway30.websitewelcome.com (HELO gateway30.websitewelcome.com) (192.185.184.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 20:55:20 +0000 Received: from cm16.websitewelcome.com (cm16.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.19]) by gateway30.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C95C311C0 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:55:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id zTiZegreUz11gzTiZeHkwS; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:55:19 -0500 Received: from 174-29-60-18.hlrn.qwest.net ([174.29.60.18]:33476 helo=bapiya.Home) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ezTiZ-001cSz-0Z; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:55:19 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Tom Tromey Subject: [RFA v3 13/13] Remove verbose code from backtrace command Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 20:55:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20180323205512.14434-14-tom@tromey.com> In-Reply-To: <20180323205512.14434-1-tom@tromey.com> References: <20180323205512.14434-1-tom@tromey.com> X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1ezTiZ-001cSz-0Z X-Source-Sender: 174-29-60-18.hlrn.qwest.net (bapiya.Home) [174.29.60.18]:33476 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 14 X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-03/txt/msg00460.txt.bz2 In https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-06/msg00741.html, Pedro asks: > Doesn't the "info verbose on" bit affect frame filters too? The answer is that yes, it could. However, it's not completely effective, because the C code can't guess how many frames might need to be unwound to satisfy the request -- a frame filter will request as many frames as it needs. Also, I tried removing this code from backtrace, and I think the result is better without it. In particular, now the expansion line occurs just before the frame that caused the expansion, like: (gdb) bt no-filters #0 0x00007ffff576cecd in poll () from /lib64/libc.so.6 Reading in symbols for ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/event-loop.c...done. #1 0x00000000007ecc33 in gdb_wait_for_event (block=1) at ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/event-loop.c:772 #2 0x00000000007ec006 in gdb_do_one_event () at ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/event-loop.c:347 #3 0x00000000007ec03e in start_event_loop () at ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/event-loop.c:371 Reading in symbols for ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/main.c...done. #4 0x000000000086693d in captured_command_loop ( Reading in symbols for ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/exceptions.c...done. data=0x0) at ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/main.c:325 So, I am proposing this patch to simply remove this code. gdb/ChangeLog 2018-03-23 Tom Tromey * stack.c (backtrace_command_1): Remove verbose code. --- gdb/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ gdb/stack.c | 18 ------------------ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/stack.c b/gdb/stack.c index 427b182c7f..9fdc9eece2 100644 --- a/gdb/stack.c +++ b/gdb/stack.c @@ -1780,24 +1780,6 @@ backtrace_command_1 (const char *count_exp, frame_filter_flags flags, count = -1; } - if (info_verbose) - { - /* Read in symbols for all of the frames. Need to do this in a - separate pass so that "Reading in symbols for xxx" messages - don't screw up the appearance of the backtrace. Also if - people have strong opinions against reading symbols for - backtrace this may have to be an option. */ - i = count; - for (fi = trailing; fi != NULL && i--; fi = get_prev_frame (fi)) - { - CORE_ADDR pc; - - QUIT; - pc = get_frame_address_in_block (fi); - expand_symtab_containing_pc (pc, find_pc_mapped_section (pc)); - } - } - for (i = 0, fi = trailing; fi && count--; i++, fi = get_prev_frame (fi)) { QUIT; -- 2.13.6