From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 88460 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2018 00:18:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 88442 invoked by uid 89); 24 Apr 2018 00:18:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=kevin, Hx-languages-length:550 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:18:14 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA6333002A77; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pinnacle.lan (ovpn-116-25.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.25]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6753C74952; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:18:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves Subject: Re: GDB 8.1.1 release 2018-04-23 update (T - 2 weeks?) Message-ID: <20180423171812.44005c7a@pinnacle.lan> In-Reply-To: <20180423141225.kaocttmdgpb7pdw4@adacore.com> References: <20180423141225.kaocttmdgpb7pdw4@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00455.txt.bz2 On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 07:12:25 -0700 Joel Brobecker wrote: > * [KevinB] Setting breakpoints with -freorder-blocks-and-partition > > Looks like this is a latent bug, but made much more visible > by newer versions of GCC having made that switch the default. > > This one was added to the 8.1.1 so we don't forget to evalute > its status before we ship 8.1.1. Any update? I don't think that there is an easy fix for this one. I'd prefer to defer it for after 8.1.1. Kevin