From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66344 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2018 12:44:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 66314 invoked by uid 89); 24 Apr 2018 12:44:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:44:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970E7117053; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 08:44:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id FsdE8OYZkfVN; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 08:44:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6704A116FDA; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 08:44:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B8C4383055; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 05:44:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:44:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves Subject: Re: GDB 8.1.1 release 2018-04-23 update (T - 2 weeks?) Message-ID: <20180424124445.42j6wjpqkmems5th@adacore.com> References: <20180423141225.kaocttmdgpb7pdw4@adacore.com> <20180423171812.44005c7a@pinnacle.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180423171812.44005c7a@pinnacle.lan> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00462.txt.bz2 > > * [KevinB] Setting breakpoints with -freorder-blocks-and-partition > > > > Looks like this is a latent bug, but made much more visible > > by newer versions of GCC having made that switch the default. > > > > This one was added to the 8.1.1 so we don't forget to evalute > > its status before we ship 8.1.1. Any update? > > I don't think that there is an easy fix for this one. I'd prefer to defer it > for after 8.1.1. Okidoke. If there are no objection (I'll give it a week), I'll change the target milestone to 8.2 instead. Thanks Kevin! -- Joel