Re: [PATCH 3/3] gdb/testsuite: Handle targets with lots of registers

[Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>]

Thanks for the review feedback.

I've updated the patch below inline with Pedro's feedback, and
included a header check as requested by Maciej.  I tested this on
x86-64 and against RiscV which is the target that was originally
causing me problems.

Thanks,
Andrew

---

[PATCH 1/2] gdb/testsuite: Handle targets with lots of registers

In gdb.base/maint.exp a test calls 'maint print registers'.  If the
target has lots of registers this may overflow expect's buffers,
causing the test to fail.

After this commit we process the output line at a time until we get back
to the GDB prompt, this should prevent buffer overrun while still
testing that the command works as required.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gdb.base/maint.exp: Process output from 'maint print registers'
	line at a time.
---
 gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog          |  5 +++++
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint.exp | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint.exp
index 93221085653..1fe36405df3 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint.exp
@@ -62,8 +62,29 @@ gdb_test_no_output "set height 0"
 gdb_file_cmd ${binfile}
 
 # Test for a regression where this command would internal-error if the
-# program wasn't running.
-gdb_test "maint print registers" "Name.*Nr.*Rel.*Offset.*Size.*Type.*"
+# program wasn't running.  If there's a lot of registers then this
+# might overflow expect's buffers, so process the output line at a
+# time.
+set saw_registers 0
+set saw_headers 0
+set test "maint print registers"
+gdb_test_multiple $test $test {
+    -re "\[^\r\n\]+Name\[^\r\n\]+Nr\[^\r\n\]+Rel\[^\r\n\]+Offset\[^\r\n\]+Size\[^\r\n\]+Type\[^\r\n\]+\[\r\n\]+" {
+	set saw_headers 1
+	exp_continue
+    }
+    -re "^\[^\r\n\]+\[0-9\]+\[^\r\n\]+\[0-9\]+\[^\r\n\]+\[0-9\]+\[^\r\n\]+\[0-9\]+\[^\r\n\]+\[\r\n\]+" {
+        set saw_registers 1
+        exp_continue
+    }
+    -re "^\\*\[0-9\]+\[^\r\n\]+\[\r\n\]+" {
+        exp_continue
+    }
+    -re "$gdb_prompt $" {
+        gdb_assert $saw_registers "$test: saw some registers"
+        gdb_assert $saw_headers "$test: saw header line"
+    }
+}
 
 # Test "mt expand-symtabs" here as it's easier to verify before we
 # run the program.
-- 
2.14.3