From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66927 invoked by alias); 10 May 2018 19:08:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 66918 invoked by uid 89); 10 May 2018 19:08:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=mystery, realizing, yours X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 May 2018 19:08:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAA41178A9; Thu, 10 May 2018 15:08:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id pvghxgbFIkIS; Thu, 10 May 2018 15:08:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC53E1178AA; Thu, 10 May 2018 15:08:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 38BB18304F; Thu, 10 May 2018 12:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 19:21:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Keith Seitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] inadvertent language switch during breakpoint_re_set_one Message-ID: <20180510190813.2ymdp3xjmewxz7ku@adacore.com> References: <1525976353-67414-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SW-Source: 2018-05/txt/msg00250.txt.bz2 > === gdb Summary === > > # of expected passes 3 > > Is my environment different from yours, i.e., is this something that > is exposed on your internal tree? That's really odd. I'm on top of branch master, and without this patch, I do get an error: | FAIL: gdb.ada/bp_fun_addr.exp: Run until breakpoint at a'address (the program exited) | | === gdb Summary === | | # of expected passes 2 | # of unexpected failures 1 You wouldn't have rebuilt GDB with my patch without realizing it, by any chance? Other than that, the only difference I can think of is that I am using GNAT Pro, rather than the GNU Ada compiler... I can send you my executable, if it can help clarify the mystery. -- Joel