public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, testsuite] Allow function arguments in bp print match in selftest_setup
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180614102107.cgh6iixu324pmpvi@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8f1dae31-ac6c-74e2-1851-ca885193aa89@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 01:56:38PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 06/12/2018 04:15 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > atm selftest.exp fails for me.
> > 
> 
> [1]
> 
> > One of the reasons is that setting the breakpoint on captured_main and running
> > to it gives us:
> > ...
> > Breakpoint 1, captured_main (data=data@entry=0x7fffffffdb80) at main.c:1144
> > ...
> > while the matching in selftest_setup only allows '()', like this:
> > ...
> > Breakpoint 1, captured_main () at main.c:1144
> > ...
> > 
> > The patch fixes this by allowing for random strings inbetween the parentheses.
> > 
> > Tested selftest.exp (with two other selftest.exp related fixes applied).
> > 
> > OK for trunk?
> 
> Yes, please push.
>

Done.

> [1] Funny, it passes for me (with the fix for stopping at captured_main),
> because the pattern below the one you're touching matches:
> 
> 	-re "Starting program.*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+,.* at .*main.c:.*$function.*$gdb_prompt $" {
> 	    # $function may be inlined, so the program stops at the line
> 	    # calling $function.
> 	    pass "$description"
> 	}
> 
> and it only happens to match because captured_main calls
> captured_main_1 first thing, which coincidentally
> matches "$function.*":
> 
>  Breakpoint 1, captured_main (data=<optimized out>) at gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/main.c:1147
>  1147      captured_main_1 (context);
>
> That would probably be better "$function .*", with a space,

Right, I observed that as well, and was thinking of this type of fix.

> but I 
> think that even better, we should try removing the "may be inlined" case
> too now, because since ddfe970e6bec ("Don't elide all inlined frames") GDB
> presents the stop at the inline function instead of at the caller.
> Like below.  Comments?
>

Agreed, that's a better solution.

Thanks,
- Tom

> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> Date: 2018-06-13 13:44:16 +0100
> 
> remove inline
> ---
> 
>  gdb/testsuite/lib/selftest-support.exp |    5 -----
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/selftest-support.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/selftest-support.exp
> index f7169e0955e..c05f3b119be 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/selftest-support.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/selftest-support.exp
> @@ -94,11 +94,6 @@ proc selftest_setup { executable function } {
>          -re "Starting program.*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+,.*$function \\(\\).*$gdb_prompt $" {
>              xfail "$description (line numbers scrambled?)"
>          }
> -	-re "Starting program.*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+,.* at .*main.c:.*$function.*$gdb_prompt $" {
> -	    # $function may be inlined, so the program stops at the line
> -	    # calling $function.
> -	    pass "$description"
> -	}
>          -re "vfork: No more processes.*$gdb_prompt $" {
>              fail "$description (out of virtual memory)"
>              set timeout $oldtimeout
> 
> Thanks,
> Pedro Alves

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-14 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-12 15:15 Tom de Vries
2018-06-13 12:56 ` Pedro Alves
2018-06-14 10:21   ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2018-06-14 10:46     ` Pedro Alves
2018-06-14 13:49       ` Tom de Vries
2018-06-14 13:52         ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180614102107.cgh6iixu324pmpvi@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).