From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83792 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2018 06:30:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 83446 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2018 06:30:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: jocasta.intra Received: from de.cellform.com (HELO jocasta.intra) (88.217.224.109) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 06:30:27 +0000 Received: from jocasta.intra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jocasta.intra (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPS id w7R6UMrL004986 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Aug 2018 08:30:22 +0200 Received: (from john@localhost) by jocasta.intra (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w7R6UMBK004985; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 08:30:22 +0200 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 06:30:00 -0000 From: John Darrington To: Simon Marchi Cc: John Darrington , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] GDB: New target s12z Message-ID: <20180827063022.ge5tsh7vntntkcmi@jocasta.intra> References: <20180823173526.26144-1-john@darrington.wattle.id.au> <20180823173526.26144-3-john@darrington.wattle.id.au> <20180826174127.g2qht4j3tqtpxfmz@jocasta.intra> <510acbee-2338-0c20-8e32-8d6ef83be3e1@simark.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SW-Source: 2018-08/txt/msg00644.txt.bz2 On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 06:55:31PM -0400, Simon Marchi wrote: I also noticed that the gdb.base/all-architectures test fails when testing s12z. Try to run make check TESTS="gdb.base/all-architectures-*.exp" in the gdb build directory, see if you get a bunch of: FAIL: gdb.base/all-architectures-6.exp: tests: osabi=AIX: arch=s12z: endian=auto: disassemble 0x0,+4 (GDB internal error) No. I get: ... === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 24 but I'll run that check before I submit my next patch. J'