From: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
To: Craig Blackmore <craig.blackmore@embecosm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: enable have_nonsteppable_watchpoint by default
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:34:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180917103409.GJ5952@embecosm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c83e39fb-b1e8-cc67-85b5-c7cc66197078@embecosm.com>
* Craig Blackmore <craig.blackmore@embecosm.com> [2018-09-16 01:13:08 +0100]:
> The RISC-V debug spec 0.13 recommends that write triggers fire before
> the write is committed. If the target follows this behaviour, then
> have_nonsteppable_watchpoint needs to be set to 1 so that GDB will step
> over the watchpoint before checking if the value has changed.
>
> This patch adds a setshow for have_nonsteppable_watchpoint which defaults
> to 1 to match the recommended behaviour. If a target does not follow
> this timing, then 'set riscv have_nonsteppable_watchpoint 0' will need
> to be issued on the command line.
Thanks for this. Just a few minor formatting issues which I've
pointed out below.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> * riscv-tdep.c (set_have_nonsteppable_watchpoint): add
> callback for 'set riscv have_nonsteppable_watchpoint'
> (riscv_gdbarch_init): initialise gdbarch setting for
> have_nonesteppable_watchpoint
Proper sentences in ChangeLogs please, capital letters and
full-stops.
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/gdb/riscv-tdep.c b/gdb/riscv-tdep.c
> index 254914c9c7..8f301d8b01 100644
> --- a/gdb/riscv-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/riscv-tdep.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,20 @@ show_use_compressed_breakpoints (struct ui_file *file, int from_tty,
> "to %s%s.\n"), value, additional_info);
> }
>
> +static int riscv_have_nonsteppable_watchpoint = 1;
You need to add a comment for this variable.
> +
> +/* The set callback for 'set riscv have-nonsteppable-watchpoint'. */
Two whitespace after the full-stop and before the comment close please.
> +
> +static void
> +set_have_nonsteppable_watchpoint (const char *args, int from_tty,
> + struct cmd_list_element *c)
> +{
> + struct gdbarch *gdbarch = target_gdbarch ();
> +
> + set_gdbarch_have_nonsteppable_watchpoint (gdbarch,
> + riscv_have_nonsteppable_watchpoint);
> +}
> +
> /* The set and show lists for 'set riscv' and 'show riscv' prefixes. */
>
> static struct cmd_list_element *setriscvcmdlist = NULL;
> @@ -2736,6 +2750,8 @@ riscv_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info,
> set_gdbarch_return_value (gdbarch, riscv_return_value);
> set_gdbarch_breakpoint_kind_from_pc (gdbarch, riscv_breakpoint_kind_from_pc);
> set_gdbarch_sw_breakpoint_from_kind (gdbarch, riscv_sw_breakpoint_from_kind);
> + set_gdbarch_have_nonsteppable_watchpoint (gdbarch,
> + riscv_have_nonsteppable_watchpoint);
>
> /* Register architecture. */
> set_gdbarch_num_regs (gdbarch, RISCV_LAST_REGNUM + 1);
> @@ -2980,4 +2996,20 @@ can be used."),
> show_use_compressed_breakpoints,
> &setriscvcmdlist,
> &showriscvcmdlist);
> +
> + add_setshow_boolean_cmd ("have-nonsteppable-watchpoint", no_class,
> + &riscv_have_nonsteppable_watchpoint,
> + _("\
> +Set whether debugger must step over hardware watchpoints"),
> + _("\
> +Show whether debugger must step over hardware watchpoints"),
> + _("\
> +The RISC-V debug spec recommends that hardware write watchpoints fire before\n\
> +the write is committed, in which case, GDB must step over the watchpoint\n\
> +before checking the old and new values. Set this option to 1 (default) for\n\
Two whitespace after full-stop again please.
> +targets that follow this behaviour, otherwise set to 0."),
As this is a boolean command can you replace references to 1 and 0
both here and in the commit message with on and off.
> + set_have_nonsteppable_watchpoint,
> + NULL,
You need to implement the show method too to allow for
internationalisation.
> + &setriscvcmdlist,
> + &showriscvcmdlist);
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-17 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-16 0:13 Craig Blackmore
2018-09-17 10:34 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2018-09-24 11:36 ` Craig Blackmore
2018-10-03 22:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-10-04 16:26 ` Craig Blackmore
2018-10-08 9:58 ` Andrew Burgess
2018-10-08 11:56 ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-08 14:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-10-08 14:37 ` Paul Koning
2018-10-08 14:42 ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-08 14:51 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-10-09 17:20 ` Craig Blackmore
2018-10-09 17:29 ` Paul Koning
2018-10-09 17:39 ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-23 10:34 ` Andrew Burgess
2018-10-08 14:50 ` Andreas Schwab
2018-09-17 12:54 ` Pedro Alves
2018-09-17 13:34 ` Andrew Burgess
2018-10-08 11:29 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180917103409.GJ5952@embecosm.com \
--to=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=craig.blackmore@embecosm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).