public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Merge common proc_service headers
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 08:27:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181001082153.GA2652@blade.nx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lg7ll81t.fsf@tromey.com>

Tom Tromey wrote:
> Gary> This series merges the majority of both into a new common file.
> 
> Tom> What's left over?
> 
> Answering my own question, it was the definition of struct
> ps_prochandle, which differs between gdb and gdbserver; and is one
> of the things that users of libthread_db are expected to define.
> 
> If there were somewhere else to put these we could remove the
> wrapper headers, which might be nice.

linux-nat.h for GDB, linux-low.h for gdbserver?

Cheers,
Gary

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-01  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-28 14:50 Gary Benson
2018-09-28 14:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] Update GDB gdb_proc_service.h workaround to match gdbserver Gary Benson
2018-09-28 19:36   ` Tom Tromey
2018-09-28 14:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] gdb_proc_service.h comment and whitespace synchronization Gary Benson
2018-09-28 19:28   ` Tom Tromey
2018-09-28 14:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] Add workaround from gdbserver's gdb_proc_service.h to GDB Gary Benson
2018-09-28 19:34   ` Tom Tromey
2018-09-28 14:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] Move duplicated code to common/gdb_proc_service.h Gary Benson
2018-09-28 19:40   ` Tom Tromey
2018-09-28 14:59 ` [PATCH 5/5][OPTIONAL] Remove ancient workaround Gary Benson
2018-09-28 19:44   ` Tom Tromey
2018-09-28 19:33 ` [PATCH 0/5] Merge common proc_service headers Tom Tromey
2018-09-28 19:46   ` Tom Tromey
2018-10-01  8:27     ` Gary Benson [this message]
2018-10-05 14:23       ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181001082153.GA2652@blade.nx \
    --to=gbenson@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).