public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: nd@arm.com,	Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] Use enum for return method for dummy calls
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181011144905.66908-2-alan.hayward@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181011144905.66908-1-alan.hayward@arm.com>

In call_function_by_hand_dummy, struct_return and hidden_first_param_p
are used to represent a single concept. Replace with an enum.

gdb/ChangeLog:

2018-10-11  Alan Hayward  <alan.hayward@arm.com>

	* gdbarch.sh (enum function_call_return_method): Add enum.
	* gdbarch.h: Regenerate.
	* infcall.c (call_function_by_hand_dummy): Replace vars with enum.
---
 gdb/gdbarch.h  | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 gdb/gdbarch.sh | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 gdb/infcall.c  | 29 +++++++++++------------------
 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch.h b/gdb/gdbarch.h
index fc2f1a84a1..5f9cf481fb 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbarch.h
+++ b/gdb/gdbarch.h
@@ -102,6 +102,23 @@ typedef void (iterate_over_regset_sections_cb)
   (const char *sect_name, int supply_size, int collect_size,
    const struct regset *regset, const char *human_name, void *cb_data);
 
+/* For a function call, are we returning a value using a normal value return
+   or a structure return - passing a hidden argument pointing to storage.
+   There are two cases: language-mandated structure return and target ABI
+   structure return.  The language version is handled by passing the return
+   location as the first parameter to the function, even preceding "this".
+   This is different from the target ABI version, which is target-specific; for
+   instance, on ia64 the first argument is passed in out0 but the hidden
+   structure return pointer would normally be passed in r8.  */
+
+enum function_call_return_method
+{
+  return_method_normal = 0,	/* Standard value return.  */
+  return_method_struct,		/* target ABI structure return.  */
+  return_method_hidden_param	/* Return hidden in first param.  */
+};
+
+
 
 /* The following are pre-initialized by GDBARCH.  */
 
diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch.sh b/gdb/gdbarch.sh
index 670ac30c03..940f10e4d3 100755
--- a/gdb/gdbarch.sh
+++ b/gdb/gdbarch.sh
@@ -1327,6 +1327,23 @@ typedef int (iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order_cb_ftype)
 typedef void (iterate_over_regset_sections_cb)
   (const char *sect_name, int supply_size, int collect_size,
    const struct regset *regset, const char *human_name, void *cb_data);
+
+/* For a function call, are we returning a value using a normal value return
+   or a structure return - passing a hidden argument pointing to storage.
+   There are two cases: language-mandated structure return and target ABI
+   structure return.  The language version is handled by passing the return
+   location as the first parameter to the function, even preceding "this".
+   This is different from the target ABI version, which is target-specific; for
+   instance, on ia64 the first argument is passed in out0 but the hidden
+   structure return pointer would normally be passed in r8.  */
+
+enum function_call_return_method
+{
+  return_method_normal = 0,	/* Standard value return.  */
+  return_method_struct,		/* target ABI structure return.  */
+  return_method_hidden_param	/* Return hidden in first param.  */
+};
+
 EOF
 
 # function typedef's
diff --git a/gdb/infcall.c b/gdb/infcall.c
index 96d43704fa..0c875ea4b9 100644
--- a/gdb/infcall.c
+++ b/gdb/infcall.c
@@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ call_function_by_hand_dummy (struct value *function,
 {
   CORE_ADDR sp;
   struct type *target_values_type;
-  unsigned char struct_return = 0, hidden_first_param_p = 0;
+  function_call_return_method return_method = return_method_normal;
   CORE_ADDR struct_addr = 0;
   CORE_ADDR real_pc;
   CORE_ADDR bp_addr;
@@ -876,20 +876,11 @@ call_function_by_hand_dummy (struct value *function,
 
   values_type = check_typedef (values_type);
 
-  /* Are we returning a value using a structure return (passing a
-     hidden argument pointing to storage) or a normal value return?
-     There are two cases: language-mandated structure return and
-     target ABI structure return.  The variable STRUCT_RETURN only
-     describes the latter.  The language version is handled by passing
-     the return location as the first parameter to the function,
-     even preceding "this".  This is different from the target
-     ABI version, which is target-specific; for instance, on ia64
-     the first argument is passed in out0 but the hidden structure
-     return pointer would normally be passed in r8.  */
+  /* Are we returning a value using a structure return?  */
 
   if (gdbarch_return_in_first_hidden_param_p (gdbarch, values_type))
     {
-      hidden_first_param_p = 1;
+      return_method = return_method_hidden_param;
 
       /* Tell the target specific argument pushing routine not to
 	 expect a value.  */
@@ -897,7 +888,8 @@ call_function_by_hand_dummy (struct value *function,
     }
   else
     {
-      struct_return = using_struct_return (gdbarch, function, values_type);
+      if (using_struct_return (gdbarch, function, values_type))
+	return_method = return_method_struct;
       target_values_type = values_type;
     }
 
@@ -1020,7 +1012,7 @@ call_function_by_hand_dummy (struct value *function,
      is being evaluated is OK because the thread is stopped until the
      expression is completely evaluated.  */
 
-  if (struct_return || hidden_first_param_p
+  if (return_method != return_method_normal
       || (stack_temporaries && class_or_union_p (values_type)))
     {
       if (gdbarch_inner_than (gdbarch, 1, 2))
@@ -1046,7 +1038,7 @@ call_function_by_hand_dummy (struct value *function,
     }
 
   std::vector<struct value *> new_args;
-  if (hidden_first_param_p)
+  if (return_method == return_method_hidden_param)
     {
       /* Add the new argument to the front of the argument list.  */
       new_args.push_back
@@ -1060,8 +1052,9 @@ call_function_by_hand_dummy (struct value *function,
      presumably, the ABI code knows where, in the call dummy, the
      return address should be pointed.  */
   sp = gdbarch_push_dummy_call (gdbarch, function, get_current_regcache (),
-				bp_addr, nargs, args,
-				sp, struct_return, struct_addr);
+				bp_addr, nargs, args, sp,
+				(return_method == return_method_struct),
+				struct_addr);
 
   /* Set up a frame ID for the dummy frame so we can pass it to
      set_momentary_breakpoint.  We need to give the breakpoint a frame
@@ -1157,7 +1150,7 @@ call_function_by_hand_dummy (struct value *function,
     sm = new_call_thread_fsm (current_ui, command_interp (),
 			      gdbarch, function,
 			      values_type,
-			      struct_return || hidden_first_param_p,
+			      return_method != return_method_normal,
 			      struct_addr);
 
     e = run_inferior_call (sm, call_thread.get (), real_pc);
-- 
2.17.1 (Apple Git-112)

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-11 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-11 14:49 [PATCH v3 0/3] Aarch64: Fix segfault when casting " Alan Hayward
2018-10-11 14:49 ` Alan Hayward [this message]
2018-10-19 11:28   ` [PATCH v3 1/3] Use enum for return method for " Pedro Alves
2018-10-11 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] Pass return_method to _push_dummy_call Alan Hayward
2018-10-19 11:31   ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-11 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] Aarch64: Fix segfault when casting dummy calls Alan Hayward
2018-10-19 11:36   ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-23 16:08     ` Alan Hayward
2018-10-24 15:15       ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-29 11:58         ` Alan Hayward
2018-10-29 12:38           ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-29 14:56             ` Alan Hayward
2018-10-29 18:13               ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-30 11:13                 ` Alan Hayward
2018-10-30 16:31                   ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-30 17:09                     ` Alan Hayward
2018-10-30 17:40                       ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-18  9:50 ` [PING][PATCH v3 0/3] " Alan Hayward

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181011144905.66908-2-alan.hayward@arm.com \
    --to=alan.hayward@arm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).