From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 130823 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2019 21:11:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 130812 invoked by uid 89); 20 Sep 2019 21:11:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.156.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 21:11:55 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8KL7PXu062434 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:11:53 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2v55kwjf2b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:11:53 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 22:11:51 +0100 Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.192) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 20 Sep 2019 22:11:48 +0100 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x8KLBL6b32178652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 20 Sep 2019 21:11:21 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C697911C04C; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 21:11:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BC611C04A; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 21:11:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc3748833570.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.159.228]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 21:11:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: by oc3748833570.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 33070D80287; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 23:11:47 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] Remove Cell Broadband Engine debugging support To: simark@simark.ca (Simon Marchi) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 21:11:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: tom@tromey.com (Tom Tromey), eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <1f8e7325-4ad5-7709-40e4-c576e52e819e@simark.ca> from "Simon Marchi" at Sep 19, 2019 09:47:51 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-cbid: 19092021-0020-0000-0000-0000036FB1BC X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19092021-0021-0000-0000-000021C5667C Message-Id: <20190920211147.33070D80287@oc3748833570.ibm.com> X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00419.txt.bz2 Simon Marchi wrote: > On 2019-09-19 1:49 p.m., Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > I just noticed that the MAINTAINERS entry is obsolete, then. > > In some cases, we've simply removed those when removing a target, > > but in others they were marked "Deleted". What should we do here? > > Personally, I don't think it's particularly useful to keep these deleted > entries in the maintainers file. For documentation and information purposes, > we could have a list of architectures that GDB supports right now and has > supported in the past (maybe we already have that in the doc?), but the > maintainers file doesn't seem appropriate for this. Makes sense to me. I've now checked the patch in, including removal of the spu target MAINTAINERS entry. Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com