* GDB 9.2 release: May 23-24 weekend
@ 2020-05-17 16:47 Joel Brobecker
2020-05-17 21:09 ` Rainer Orth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2020-05-17 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Hi everyone,
Nothing much since the last update. At the suggestion of Christian,
I created a PR and backported the following change:
Bug 26003 - infinite loop loading symbols from separate debug objfile
As of now, there are no other issues that I have heard we want to
backport in gdb-9.2. Pending new comments, I am planning on going ahead
with the GDB 9.2 release sometime during the next weekend (May 23-24).
Cheers,
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 9.2 release: May 23-24 weekend
2020-05-17 16:47 GDB 9.2 release: May 23-24 weekend Joel Brobecker
@ 2020-05-17 21:09 ` Rainer Orth
2020-05-18 11:36 ` Rainer Orth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Orth @ 2020-05-17 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches
Hi Joel,
> Nothing much since the last update. At the suggestion of Christian,
> I created a PR and backported the following change:
>
> Bug 26003 - infinite loop loading symbols from separate debug objfile
>
> As of now, there are no other issues that I have heard we want to
> backport in gdb-9.2. Pending new comments, I am planning on going ahead
> with the GDB 9.2 release sometime during the next weekend (May 23-24).
I've two patches forthcoming that unbreak the Solaris 11.4 build: as
reported in
Bug 25981 - Use of short i386 register names breaks compilation on recent Solaris 11.4
a forthcoming Solaris 11.4 update will include a change to
<sys/regset.h> that will break the gdb build (very few other packages
are affected). I have patches ready (one each for amd64 and i386), but
withheld them for a bit while the exact changes to <sys/regset.h> were
being fleshed out. I expect to post them tomorrow.
It would be nice if they could be included in gdb 9.2 so we have a
release that compiles and works (master is currently badly broken since
the multi-target merge: Bug 25939). Both patches are simple, so the
risk should be minimal.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 9.2 release: May 23-24 weekend
2020-05-17 21:09 ` Rainer Orth
@ 2020-05-18 11:36 ` Rainer Orth
2020-05-18 14:18 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Orth @ 2020-05-18 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches
Hi Joel.
>> As of now, there are no other issues that I have heard we want to
>> backport in gdb-9.2. Pending new comments, I am planning on going ahead
>> with the GDB 9.2 release sometime during the next weekend (May 23-24).
>
> I've two patches forthcoming that unbreak the Solaris 11.4 build: as
> reported in
>
> Bug 25981 - Use of short i386 register names breaks compilation on recent Solaris 11.4
>
> a forthcoming Solaris 11.4 update will include a change to
> <sys/regset.h> that will break the gdb build (very few other packages
> are affected). I have patches ready (one each for amd64 and i386), but
> withheld them for a bit while the exact changes to <sys/regset.h> were
> being fleshed out. I expect to post them tomorrow.
done now:
Remove unused ps_lgetLDT etc. on Solaris/x86 [PR25981]
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-May/168713.html
Avoid short i386 register names on Solaris/x86 [PR25981]
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-May/168714.html
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 9.2 release: May 23-24 weekend
2020-05-18 11:36 ` Rainer Orth
@ 2020-05-18 14:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-05-19 8:16 ` Rainer Orth
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2020-05-18 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rainer Orth; +Cc: gdb-patches
Hi Rainer,
> >> As of now, there are no other issues that I have heard we want to
> >> backport in gdb-9.2. Pending new comments, I am planning on going ahead
> >> with the GDB 9.2 release sometime during the next weekend (May 23-24).
> >
> > I've two patches forthcoming that unbreak the Solaris 11.4 build: as
> > reported in
> >
> > Bug 25981 - Use of short i386 register names breaks compilation on recent Solaris 11.4
> >
> > a forthcoming Solaris 11.4 update will include a change to
> > <sys/regset.h> that will break the gdb build (very few other packages
> > are affected). I have patches ready (one each for amd64 and i386), but
> > withheld them for a bit while the exact changes to <sys/regset.h> were
> > being fleshed out. I expect to post them tomorrow.
>
> done now:
>
> Remove unused ps_lgetLDT etc. on Solaris/x86 [PR25981]
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-May/168713.html
>
> Avoid short i386 register names on Solaris/x86 [PR25981]
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-May/168714.html
Thanks for the suggestions. I agree these would be useful, and that
they look simple and safe. So I sent my OK to each patch.
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 9.2 release: May 23-24 weekend
2020-05-18 14:18 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2020-05-19 8:16 ` Rainer Orth
2020-05-19 13:23 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Orth @ 2020-05-19 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches
Hi Joel,
>> >> As of now, there are no other issues that I have heard we want to
>> >> backport in gdb-9.2. Pending new comments, I am planning on going ahead
>> >> with the GDB 9.2 release sometime during the next weekend (May 23-24).
>> >
>> > I've two patches forthcoming that unbreak the Solaris 11.4 build: as
>> > reported in
>> >
>> > Bug 25981 - Use of short i386 register names breaks compilation
>> > on recent Solaris 11.4
>> >
>> > a forthcoming Solaris 11.4 update will include a change to
>> > <sys/regset.h> that will break the gdb build (very few other packages
>> > are affected). I have patches ready (one each for amd64 and i386), but
>> > withheld them for a bit while the exact changes to <sys/regset.h> were
>> > being fleshed out. I expect to post them tomorrow.
>>
>> done now:
>>
>> Remove unused ps_lgetLDT etc. on Solaris/x86 [PR25981]
>> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-May/168713.html
>>
>> Avoid short i386 register names on Solaris/x86 [PR25981]
>> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-May/168714.html
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. I agree these would be useful, and that
> they look simple and safe. So I sent my OK to each patch.
thanks. I've now installed both of them on master and the gdb-9 branch.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GDB 9.2 release: May 23-24 weekend
2020-05-19 8:16 ` Rainer Orth
@ 2020-05-19 13:23 ` Joel Brobecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2020-05-19 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rainer Orth; +Cc: gdb-patches
> >> Remove unused ps_lgetLDT etc. on Solaris/x86 [PR25981]
> >> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-May/168713.html
> >>
> >> Avoid short i386 register names on Solaris/x86 [PR25981]
> >> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-May/168714.html
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestions. I agree these would be useful, and that
> > they look simple and safe. So I sent my OK to each patch.
>
> thanks. I've now installed both of them on master and the gdb-9 branch.
Awesome. Thanks for confirming, Rainer.
--
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-19 13:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-17 16:47 GDB 9.2 release: May 23-24 weekend Joel Brobecker
2020-05-17 21:09 ` Rainer Orth
2020-05-18 11:36 ` Rainer Orth
2020-05-18 14:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-05-19 8:16 ` Rainer Orth
2020-05-19 13:23 ` Joel Brobecker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).