From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from rock.gnat.com (rock.gnat.com [205.232.38.15]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10612385702E for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:06:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 10612385702E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=adacore.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=brobecker@adacore.com Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E543D56182; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:06:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id b+crdLgk6OJb; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:06:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B739556181; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:06:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 29989849D1; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:06:34 -0700 From: Joel Brobecker To: Christian Biesinger Cc: gdb-patches Subject: Re: Propose GDB 10 branch this Fri-Sun (Sep 11-13) [2020-09-05 Update] Message-ID: <20200908170634.GD18641@adacore.com> References: <20200905205318.GA30158@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 17:06:37 -0000 > > Below is another status update before branching. We're almost there, > > and if all goes well, I propose we create the branch during the weekend > > of Fri-Sun Sep 11-13, immediately followed by creating the first > > prerelease. > > This bug was just filed with patch: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26586 > > It seems like that patch would be good to have for gdb 10, though it > probably doesn't have to block branching. Thanks for the heads up Cristian. I marked it 10.1 for the target milestone to remember about it. I agree it's not branch blocking. It shouldn't be release blocking either because, as far as I can tell, the problem was also in GDB 8.2 and GDB 9, but given the type of fix we are talking about, perhaps worth waiting a bit for... -- Joel